Rogers Ramblings: Freedom of public newspapers and other media

Hi everyone! We are back again in the saddle of history of how nations go through fundamental changes in the matter of a few short years. Before we get into this week’s rambling I just want to express my sincere gratitude for all the people who mention their support of the weekly rambling. Please do not forget our wonderful paper and editor that permits free speech to be printed! We are very blessed in our community. I truly hope and pray we do not take these privileges for granted and take a moment to send our editor an email for her to continue to work hard each week to give us a paper. O K friends and neighbors let’s get started! You know I love a series of articles. This third week of this rambling series is how to change a nation. Our example and segway used was adding another spark plug to a high performance engine. The more plugs installed and firing the smoother and more powerful it becomes. Just in case you missed the last two weeks we have already covered the Indoctrination of children and gun control by politicians. Please go back and review the previous two if you missed them. Without further ado let's begin. Number three spark plug is to control the narrative of the news media. Oh wow! This plug will touch everyone because in our climate of instant news we are all (myself included ) are indoctrinated daily. I am simply using the eight steps Hitler used to change his Germany; controlling the news media is simply one of them. Alright now enough background. Hitler came to power on January 30, of 1933. However: he had already laid his groundwork down before getting full power. One of his first steps was to appoint a director of propaganda. He appointed Joseph Goebbels to begin the control of film, radio, theater, arts and the press. He shut down all free newspapers and other forms of communication which did not comply with Hitler’s Ideology. Friends, do we have such acts going on in our nation today? Has our federal government ever been guilty of censoring what news we hear through different means? Oh my! Yes! Yes! Yes! This subject I could write many weeks on this one alone. Let’s just name a few examples. The border crisis. Did you know there are three different ways but only one is usually mentioned. One is by tens of thousands being airlifted. Two a sanctioned suggested area and three all of the rest of border crossings along the southern part of the United States. They are being given apps, free phones, debit cards with money, and many free benefits to go where they choose. Let's take Hollywood, have you noticed our movies and tv promote the new woke agenda. I heard a high up politician a few days ago, ‘everyone needs to be woke and more woke’. Now let’s bring up a controversial subject matter of our recent covid crisis. Personally, I had covid twice.There was a lot of misinformation from our government during that time period. Mainly how they prevented freedom of speech on both sides to help people choose what they felt was best for them. I personally knew of doctors who were threatened with their jobs and even doctors in the military who lost their jobs because they did now go along with the propaganda from our government. Our doctor told us when it came out if your family has a history of blood clots not to take the jab. I personally know one family of 8 kids. Three took the jab and the other 5 five did not. One died from a massive heart attack a few weeks later and another one had a massive heart attack who survived and the third one with no known side effects to date. Now rambling readers you would think there would be journalists that would show on our public tv stations these problems and side effects from the jab. No! Too much money is involved from stations and other media outlets to have any negative advertising. Certain companies poured millions of dollars into the stations and in order to receive the money —--no negative publicity. Now folks, please do not take me wrong. I am all for anyone and everyone taking the jabs. My problem is how we were censored from hearing both sides. There